![]()
For instance, a robot with a 100-year battery life getting buried underground. Usually, when this arises, it is eternal unless he's freed by outside forces, but a "mere" years-long or centuries-long fate is possible. This is often a variation of Taken for Granite in which the victim remains conscious, and the worst-case scenario for tropes such as Sealed Room in the Middle of Nowhere, Forced Transformation, Phantom-Zone Picture, and Who Wants to Live Forever?. They are immobilized or otherwise contained, unable to communicate with anyone, and unlikely to be removed from this situation - not even by death - anytime in the foreseeable future. I have no mouth and i must scream am twitter free#Suicide is not an option even death never comes to free them from it. It lays down some fine ground work for Peanut Hamper as a threat going forward.Īnd those are my thoughts on “A Mathematically Perfect Redemption.” While the title sits on a throne of lies, I appreciate the odd leg pulling every now and then, and this episode definitely took me by the ankles.A character suffers from an extremely horrifying Fate Worse than Death. The show knew we expected a redemption story and played with that. April Fools! The episode twists it all around and reveals that Peanut Hamper’s seeming growth was but a ruse, a means to a nasty end. The episode strings you along to think that everything will turn out well and Peanut Hamper will complete her character arc even the title is in on it. It has an Avatar bent to it, with Peanut Hamper getting more attached (or so we think) with the bird people, which goes to some…interesting places. Okay, getting past Peanut Hamper, I did enjoy this episode’s story. The ego, the greater-than-thou attitude, I think those work for her, but the constant complaining gets grating and isn’t as funny as it might be. That is, if they tone down the other thing I don’t like about her, which is her whininess. Now that the show has made her into an unambiguous villain, I’m hoping she’ll be more enjoyable. Putting her in a protagonist role, while interesting, is like putting a glove on a foot. One, she really is meant to be an antagonist. However, while I can think of times this archetype has worked well (off the top of my head I get GLaDOS from Portal or AM from I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream), Peanut Hamper is much harder to enjoy. It’s a standard personality for an antagonist AI character to have. I have no mouth and i must scream am twitter full#She is full of herself, conceited, and looks down on pretty much everyone, organic life forms especially. And I know, to a certain extend that is very much the point. My only problem is Peanut Hamper herself. I have no mouth and i must scream am twitter android#Peanut Hamper: Whiny android Star Trek villain It makes the season feel free even deep in. I also appreciate the writers daring to shift focus from our familiar characters and doing something more unique. Her dismissiveness and decision to leave the Lower Deck crew for dead was played for laughs at first, but is not a vital part of her character. Not only do we quickly get her concept and character, but the show gives longtime viewers some new context. If you haven’t seen past seasons, “A Mathematically Perfect Redemption” does a great job of filling in the uninitiated it opens with one of the climatic scenes from the episode that originally introduced Peanut Hamper. Could life with these simple beings inspire a change of heart in the heartless android? Find out in this episode of Star Trek: Lower Decks, “A Mathematically Perfect Redemption.” After betraying the Lower Decks crew in a dire moment back in season 1, the inorganic ensign finds her way to a planet populated by a race of anthropomorphic bird people who worship her as a god. Peanut Hamper, an old friend gone rogue, reappears from the infinite void of space. By Richard Urquiza 1 week ago Follow Tweet ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |